Gameweek 4
Sorted by Clean Sheet Probability
Rank | GW | Team | Opponent | H/A | CS% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 |
Newcastle
|
Wolves | H | 47.6% |
2 | 4 |
Arsenal
|
Nott'm Forest | H | 45.6% |
3 | 4 |
Liverpool
|
Burnley | A | 45.6% |
4 | 4 |
Crystal Palace
|
Sunderland | H | 43.2% |
5 | 4 |
Fulham
|
Leeds | H | 36.4% |
6 | 4 |
Man City
|
Man Utd | H | 35.4% |
7 | 4 |
Chelsea
|
Brentford | A | 33.6% |
8 | 4 |
Spurs
|
West Ham | A | 32.7% |
9 | 4 |
Everton
|
Aston Villa | H | 29.7% |
10 | 4 |
Aston Villa
|
Everton | A | 27.3% |
11 | 4 |
Bournemouth
|
Brighton | H | 26.2% |
12 | 4 |
West Ham
|
Spurs | H | 24.1% |
13 | 4 |
Brighton
|
Bournemouth | A | 20.3% |
14 | 4 |
Brentford
|
Chelsea | H | 19.1% |
15 | 4 |
Leeds
|
Fulham | A | 18.5% |
16 | 4 |
Sunderland
|
Crystal Palace | A | 18.4% |
17 | 4 |
Man Utd
|
Man City | A | 15.8% |
18 | 4 |
Burnley
|
Liverpool | H | 15.7% |
19 | 4 |
Nott'm Forest
|
Arsenal | A | 15.4% |
20 | 4 |
Wolves
|
Newcastle | A | 14.0% |
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Clean sheet odds are calculated using historical team performance data, including:
- Team defensive strength - Goals conceded per match, clean sheet percentage
- Opponent attacking strength - Goals scored per match, attacking form
- Home/Away advantage - Teams typically perform better at home
- Recent form - Last 5 games performance weighted more heavily
- Head-to-head records - Historical performance between specific teams
The algorithm combines these factors to predict the probability of a clean sheet (0 goals conceded) for each team.
- CS% - Clean Sheet Percentage (probability of keeping a clean sheet)
- Def Contrib/90 - Defensive Contributions per 90 minutes (key for FPL bonus points)
- Value Score - Defensive contributions divided by player cost (higher = better value)
- Mins% - Percentage of total possible minutes played this season
- BPS/90 - Bonus Points System points per 90 minutes
- xGI/90 - Expected Goal Involvements per 90 minutes
- xGC/90 - Expected Goals Conceded per 90 minutes
- Form - Average points per game in recent matches
For Defenders:
- Look for teams with high CS% (30%+) over multiple gameweeks
- Prioritize players with high Def Contrib/90 for bonus points
- Check Mins% to ensure the player actually plays
- Consider Value Score for budget-friendly options
For Goalkeepers:
- Focus on Saves/90 for consistent points even without clean sheets
- Look for teams with good CS% but also high save potential
- Consider penalty save potential for bonus points
Teams might not appear in the suggestions if:
- Low clean sheet odds - Average CS% below 30% over selected weeks
- Insufficient data - Not enough completed matches for reliable statistics
- Player availability - No defenders/goalkeepers meeting the minimum criteria
- Injury status - Key players marked as injured or doubtful
Try adjusting the filters (weeks, ownership, cost) to see more options.
The data is updated in real-time from the official FPL API, including:
- Player statistics - Updated after each match
- Team performance - Refreshed with latest results
- Injury status - Updated as news becomes available
- Ownership percentages - Live data from FPL
For the most accurate predictions, check back regularly, especially after matchdays.
Single Gameweek View:
- Shows clean sheet odds for one specific gameweek
- Perfect for short-term decisions and transfers
- Includes detailed team statistics for that week's fixtures
Multi-Week Outlook:
- Shows average clean sheet odds over multiple gameweeks
- Better for long-term planning and team structure
- Helps identify teams with consistent defensive potential
Use the outlook for planning your team, then check individual gameweeks for specific decisions.
Key takeaways
- Highest CS%: Newcastle (47.6%) vs Wolves
- Best away shout: Liverpool (45.6%) at Burnley
- Solid differential: West Ham (24.1%) vs Spurs
- Lowest CS%: Wolves (14.0%) at Newcastle
Player suggestions (DEF only)
Fit defenders with high defensive contributions and clean sheet potential. Ranked by Defensive Contributions per 90 - the key FPL metric for defender bonus points.
- Newcastle — Highest CS%: Burn (£5.0, 5.8% TSB, 32pts (6.4 PPG), Def Contrib/90 9.0, 96.8% mins, BPS/90 20.6, Form 5.8), Livramento (£5.1, 9.6% TSB, 31pts (6.2 PPG), Def Contrib/90 3.0, 96.8% mins, BPS/90 22.8, Form 5.5)
- Liverpool — Best away shout: Virgil (£6.1, 29.8% TSB, 26pts (5.2 PPG), Def Contrib/90 12.0, 96.8% mins, BPS/90 18.2, Form 5.8), Kerkez (£5.9, 5.2% TSB, 11pts (2.2 PPG), Def Contrib/90 8.4, 78.7% mins, BPS/90 13.0, Form 2.8)
- West Ham — Differential (≤10% TSB): Mavropanos (£4.4, 0.1% TSB, 12pts (4.0 PPG), Def Contrib/90 9.3, 58.1% mins, BPS/90 12.3, Form 4.0), Kilman (£4.4, 0.2% TSB, 9pts (1.8 PPG), Def Contrib/90 8.4, 96.8% mins, BPS/90 4.0, Form 3.0)
- Wolves — Popular to avoid: Agbadou (£4.5, 0.4% TSB, 12pts (2.4 PPG), Def Contrib/90 10.4, 96.8% mins, BPS/90 8.0, Form 2.7), Krejčí (£4.5, 0.0% TSB, 8pts (4.0 PPG), Def Contrib/90 6.0, 38.7% mins, BPS/90 8.0, Form 2.7)