Wirtz vs Cherki: Who’s the Smarter Signing Through Stats, Tactics, and Value?
There are moments in football when a signing feels seismic – when clubs don’t just buy players, they gamble on legacies. This summer, two of Europe’s most mercurial talents – Rayan Cherki and Florian Wirtz – have swapped the continental spotlight for the pressure cooker of the Premier League. One heads to Pep Guardiola’s footballing laboratory at Manchester City; the other, to Arne Slot’s engine room at Liverpool. These are not transfers. These are declarations of intent.
Cherki and Wirtz aren’t just creative midfielders – they’re creative revolutions waiting to unfold. Both can bend a match to their will. Both play the game like it’s jazz. But only one will prove to be the smarter investment, the sharper weapon, the ultimate edge in a title race that no longer tolerates mediocrity.
What happens when the ruthless precision of Guardiola meets the unpredictable artistry of Cherki? What unfolds when Slot unleashes Wirtz’s chaos within Liverpool’s structured fury? This is more than numbers on a balance sheet. It’s a question of fit, of function, of future. This is Wirtz vs Cherki.
In a transfer window flush with drama and dollars and brimming with headline moves, two attacking midfielders stand apart and slice through the noise: Rayan Cherki to Manchester City for €40 million and Florian Wirtz to Liverpool for a staggering €136.3 million.
On paper, these are two creative prodigies – technically sublime, tactically intelligent, and pivotal in their respective 2024/25 campaigns. But beneath the fanfare lies a sharper question: who’s the better signing – not just on flair, but through three unforgiving lenses: statistical edge, tactical fit, and financial value?
Wirtz vs Cherki: The Numbers Never Lie, But They Do Whisper
Let’s begin with raw performance metrics.
Player Comparison: Rayan Cherki vs Florian Wirtz
| Category | Rayan Cherki (Lyon) | Florian Wirtz (Leverkusen) |
| Games Played | 44 | 45 |
| Minutes Played | 3107 | 3389 |
| Goals | 12 | 16 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 7.24 | 13.03 |
| Assists | 20 | 14 |
| Expected Assists (xA) | 17.58 | 11.86 |
| Key Passes | 128 | 91 |
| Accurate Passes | 1593 (APS% 84.1%) | 1842 (APS% 83.8%) |
| Tackles | 22 | 41 |
| Interceptions | 11 | 17 |
| Yellow Cards | 5 | 8 |
| Errors Leading to Goals | 0 | 0 |
Goal Involvement: Cherki’s 32 G+A beats Wirtz’s 30. But Wirtz edges Cherki on goals: 16 to 12. Cherki, however, outperformed his xG by almost 5 goals. That’s efficiency – and perhaps overperformance.
Creativity: Cherki’s 128 key passes dwarf Wirtz’s 91. Add to those 20 assists from an xA of 17.58, and Cherki looks like the more potent chance creator.
Passing Accuracy: Marginal difference – Cherki at 84.1% to Wirtz’s 83.8%. But Wirtz made more passes under greater tactical load in a pressing-heavy system.
Defensive Contributions: Wirtz recorded nearly double the tackles (41 vs. 22) and significantly more interceptions (17 vs. 11). His ability to press and win possession suits Slot’s style.
Radar Analysis
While analysing the percentiles, it was obvious that it was a closely contested battle on many metrics.
Florian Wirtz ranks in the 93rd percentile for progressive passes (averaging 6.63 per 90 minutes) and the 88th percentile for progressive carries (averaging 4.60 per 90 minutes).
Ryan Cherki outranks him in both these aspects, with Cherki ranking in the 99th percentile for progressive passes (8.88 per 90 minutes) and the 94th percentile for progressive carries (4.88 per 90 minutes).
This highlights that Cherki has been operating with more freedom at Lyon and is involved in various aspects of build-up play, often dropping deeper, acting as a ball-carrier from deep and progressing forward. Wirtz at Leverkusen, however, is more of a final third creator who loves to pick up the ball in more advanced regions, in the tight half spaces and looks to find short, incisive passes or shoot.
This can again be testified to through their progressive passes received statistics, where Wirtz belongs in the 89th percentile (11.08 per 90 minutes), while Cherki ranks in the 49th percentile (7.60 per 90 minutes), highlighting Wirtz operates predominantly as an advanced creator. In terms of shot-creating actions, it’s another closely contested fight with Cherki (99th percentile, 6.80 shot-creating actions per 90 minutes), edging out Wirtz (93rd percentile, 5.53 shot-creating actions per 90 minutes).
Both are versatile enough to create dangerous opportunities from different areas across the pitch. Interestingly Cherki slightly outranks Wirtz in assists for this season (98th percentile for Cherki and 97th percentile for Wirtz).
Wirtz (93rd percentile) arguably is the better dribbler, outranking Cherki’s dribbling percentile (79th percentile) easily and perhaps better in the take-ons (96th percentile for Wirtz and 90th percentile for Cherki). When it comes to key passes, even though Cherki made the higher number of key passes for this season, percentile-wise, Florian Wirtz has gained the upper hand with his 98th percentile rank slightly edging Ryan Cherki’s 97th percentile. With regards to the overall attacking actions (95th percentile for Wirtz and the 80th percentile for Cherki) and contributions to chance creation (xG+xA), (98th percentile for Wirtz and 91st percentile for Cherki) Wirtz comfortably ranks higher.
The underlying data paints a revealing portrait of two elite creative profiles who thrive in different tactical contexts. Rayan Cherki, despite operating with more positional freedom at Lyon, demonstrates marginal superiority in raw assist numbers and maintains a 98th percentile rank in assists – a testament to his flair for final-ball execution and unlocking compact defences.
However, when performance is normalised through percentile metrics – adjusting for competition level and tactical structure – Florian Wirtz consistently scores higher across critical creative and attacking outputs. His 98th percentile in key passes, 95th in overall attacking actions, and 98th in combined xG+xA reflect an advanced playmaker operating at an elite, system-driven standard. Wirtz also shows greater security and sharpness in individual duels, boasting a 93rd percentile in dribbling and 96th in take-ons – key indicators of his ability to destabilise defences in tight spaces. While Cherki shines in looser, improvisational roles, Wirtz’s efficiency and versatility across structured patterns of play make him tactically invaluable in high-press, precision-based systems like Arne Slot’s Liverpool. This contrast is not just statistical – it’s systemic.
Verdict (Statistical): Cherki has slightly edged Wirtz in terms of being the superior creator. But Wirtz is more well-rounded, more versatile and more threatening, especially in overall final third output and defensive metrics.
Tactical Prism: Where Do They Fit & What Do They Bring?
Rayan Cherki – Manchester City:
Guardiola doesn’t sign chaos. He signs control players who can interpret space like lines of poetry. Cherki is an outlier.
Positional Versatility: Highly versatile. Primarily a left-sided attacking midfielder but featured as a No. 10 and inverted winger.
Dribbling Style: More expressive, risk heavy. Ranked in the 79th percentile for dribbles among peers, with progressive carries at 94th percentile.
Role Fit: City often need unpredictability in sterile games when they face a tightly knit low block. Cherki’s ability to unpick low blocks could be vital in matches where City dominate possession but lack penetration.
Concerns: He lacks Wirtz’s defensive diligence. Only 22 tackles all season-he won’t press like Bernardo Silva.
Florian Wirtz – Liverpool:
Wirtz is tailor-made for Slot’s evolving and tactically fluid midfield. His work rate is intense. His vision? Sharp and clinical.
Tactical Intelligence: Wirtz reads the game three steps ahead. Operated as a roaming No. 10 but also dropped into deeper creative roles. His role? Likely as a high-positioned “free 8” – a playmaker given licence to roam and dictate.
Ball Progression: Carries and distributes efficiently, ranking in the 93rd percentile for dribbles and 88th percentile for progressive carries.
Pressing Utility: 41 tackles and 17 interceptions confirm his suitability for Liverpool’s press-heavy setup.
Final Third End Product: Surpassing both xG and xA indicates both technical execution and mental composure.
Verdict (Tactical): Wirtz fits Liverpool’s system like a glove. Cherki adds flair to City but will require more tactical coaching to find himself accustomed and attuned to Guardiola’s philosophy.
Financial Prism: Value for Money and Long-Term ROI
Florian Wirtz – Cost:
€117.5m up front & €18.8m add-ons. Potential Total: €136.3m (£116m)
Contract: Five years. British Record Potential: Yes
Pros:
- Absolutely premium talent level
- Already a Bundesliga champion, breaking Bayern’s hegemony, thus showcasing elite talent.
- High resale potential (still only 22)
Cons:
- Costly. He must deliver elite output year in, year out.
- The high pressure of being a record signing – expectations can affect integration and performance.
Rayan Cherki – Cost:
~€40m total fee (no major add-ons like Wirtz). Contract until 2030.
Pros:
- Massive value acquisition
- High ceiling and resale potential
- Low risk financially for a club like City
- Age (21) offers plenty of development room
Cons:
- Not a guaranteed starter with Guardiola, known to slowly integrate new signings in his team
- Needs Guardiola’s patience and tactical maturity
Verdict (Financial): Cherki offers vastly better value for money. Wirtz is a proven performer, but at a premium. If the add-ons are triggered – mostly tied to major trophies with Wirtz in the side – it becomes a British record. Fabrizio Romano notes Bayer Leverkusen want the deal seen as a €150m exit. Liverpool are keen to keep the figure grounded, thus testifying to the risk of falling short of simply sky-touching expectations.
Final Word: Who Got the Better Deal?
Let’s weigh up the scales:
Cherki vs Wirtz – Comparative Lens
| Lens | Winner |
| Statistical | Slight edge to Cherki (more assists, chance creation) |
| Tactical | Wirtz (fits Slot’s press system, more balanced) |
| Financial | Cherki (three times cheaper, lower risk) |
This isn’t black and white. Wirtz is a more complete player today – decisive, consistent, and tactically elite. But Cherki is a creative trailblazer – chaotic, brilliant, and possibly more explosive in the long term.
Cherki brings the unpredictable brilliance of street football dressed in elite polish. Wirtz is the cold-blooded composer, orchestrating chaos with precision. They are polar opposites. They are parallel forces. They are football’s future, arriving now.
Manchester City may have landed the artist who defies tactical gravity, a player who sees angles before they exist. Liverpool, on the other hand, has invested in a metronome with venom, a creator who thrives on structure and punishes disorder. Both clubs have bet big – but only one will laugh last.
One will ignite title runs, inspire tactical rewrites, and redefine how we think about the No. 10 role. The other may falter, flicker, or fly too close to the sun. That’s the beauty of this duel. It’s not just about stats or systems – it’s about who dares to reshape the game in their image. If City properly integrate Cherki, they may have stolen a generational creator for €40 million. If Wirtz shoulders the pressure, Liverpool will have signed their next crown jewel.
But purely based on balance across all three axes, Manchester City appear to have secured the better deal – less cost, potentially high output, and long-term upside.
Still, football isn’t played on spreadsheets. Come August, these numbers will give way to narrative. And that’s when we’ll truly know.
About The Author
